Obama's announced the deployment 30,000 troops to Afghanistan; a withdrawl starting in 2011; and the use of a modified amalgamation of counter-terrorism (drone attacks) and McChrystals COIN (counter-insurgency) strategy. After being hammered out after wipespread and heated debate throughout the upper echelons of the executive branch and its agencies (
How Obama Came to Plan for ‘Surge’ in Afghanistan), it has failed to fully satisfy anyone in substantive terms. His cold-blooded approach in laying out his plans last week at West Point, likewise, draws a clear line between the charismatic senator of the 2007 campaign and the dispassionate messiah of present day. The most interesting analysis of the real face of the Obama Administration that is surfacing in one of the most important decision yet in his presidency has come out of David Brooks of the NY Times (
The Analytic Mode), and Dana Milbank of the Washington Post (
Obama the mortal). In summary Obama is an incrementalist; he values pragmatism and compromise above ideology; and he designs policy to evolve in a complex and changing world through argument and negotiation. Understandably this doesn't give much for any "side" to grasp onto and, in a way, is disruptive to the whole ideological balance of power that has stabilized the masses since the 1950's. In promoting the radical center during his campaign, everyone who wanted to see, saw what they wanted but here, a year or so afterward, we realize we bought a messiah, a sort of technocratic Jesus, and everyone is left clawing at their shadows.
(Jon Stewart did a nice little piece in this vein check it out
here.)